I was interesting about ‘Gaps In the Mass Media.’ That is a number of theoretical contrasts and interventions suggest that there may be ways of deliberation arena, or the public sphere to extended through the application of new communication technologies and the power appreciationof the audience.
Some of the theorists have argued is the potential to remake is ‘the public sphere’(Habermas 1989). It is a way of theorizing out relationship between media, politics and society.
While Marshall McLuhan argued that ‘electricity decentralized and not centralize raised the possibility that the electronic media may opening involvement in a space comparable to the public sphere. This developed that we are witnessing now ‘the second media age, and supplanting the first media age of decentalising broadcast media arising from some sources to many consumers, according to Mark Posters. This second media will eventually be readily accessible and make a new politics based of the communication of many to many.
It is very interesting.
Also I was interesting about ‘Citizen-Hacker: Doing Global Democracy.’ The Hacker has cleared one space and recreated the citizen to exercise free speech in the emerging in formation regime.
Hackers are working on the free speech frontier,’ opposing the re-establishment of rights in the newly emerging information society(Taylor 1999:61). They refuse to accept ‘official’ story at face value-to find their own truth. It
Because of Hackers it draw spaces and directs information which open democratic potentialities.
Hackers really are trying to free information to the public. They are searching the most concise programming solution, using simplicity to hack out through the complexity. The are trying to access to computers as free and open as possible.
All of this is interesting.
What do you think of the Australian Government’s plan to censor the internet (the so called “Clean Feed’)?
It is good for censorship from the Australian Government if they filter sexually explicit materials such as child pornography, bestiality and violent pornography. But if it pose a threat to our democratic freedoms, I would say no. I don’t want Australia to join a censorship club such as China, Iran and North Korea. For example, the prohibited sites will probably be secret, so it will be hard to know what content the government has banned. So It is t dangerous to censorship the internet from the Australian government.
What place does censorship have in democracy?
None. No person can achieve his own happiness if he is prohibited from acting his rational decisions especially by the government. Freedom is control over ones own life, liberty, etc. Without freedom , a person’s mind is paralyzed; being depend on others, like being a vegetable. Democracy is about freedom . We can decide what we like or not. So we don’t need censorship from the government at all.
http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/
Some of the theorists have argued is the potential to remake is ‘the public sphere’(Habermas 1989). It is a way of theorizing out relationship between media, politics and society.
While Marshall McLuhan argued that ‘electricity decentralized and not centralize raised the possibility that the electronic media may opening involvement in a space comparable to the public sphere. This developed that we are witnessing now ‘the second media age, and supplanting the first media age of decentalising broadcast media arising from some sources to many consumers, according to Mark Posters. This second media will eventually be readily accessible and make a new politics based of the communication of many to many.
It is very interesting.
Also I was interesting about ‘Citizen-Hacker: Doing Global Democracy.’ The Hacker has cleared one space and recreated the citizen to exercise free speech in the emerging in formation regime.
Hackers are working on the free speech frontier,’ opposing the re-establishment of rights in the newly emerging information society(Taylor 1999:61). They refuse to accept ‘official’ story at face value-to find their own truth. It
Because of Hackers it draw spaces and directs information which open democratic potentialities.
Hackers really are trying to free information to the public. They are searching the most concise programming solution, using simplicity to hack out through the complexity. The are trying to access to computers as free and open as possible.
All of this is interesting.
What do you think of the Australian Government’s plan to censor the internet (the so called “Clean Feed’)?
It is good for censorship from the Australian Government if they filter sexually explicit materials such as child pornography, bestiality and violent pornography. But if it pose a threat to our democratic freedoms, I would say no. I don’t want Australia to join a censorship club such as China, Iran and North Korea. For example, the prohibited sites will probably be secret, so it will be hard to know what content the government has banned. So It is t dangerous to censorship the internet from the Australian government.
What place does censorship have in democracy?
None. No person can achieve his own happiness if he is prohibited from acting his rational decisions especially by the government. Freedom is control over ones own life, liberty, etc. Without freedom , a person’s mind is paralyzed; being depend on others, like being a vegetable. Democracy is about freedom . We can decide what we like or not. So we don’t need censorship from the government at all.
http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/
0 comments:
Post a Comment